Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs pulse-alpha

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
pulse-alphaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	67/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
pulse-alpha	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

Context length

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text, Image

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.15/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.60/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.003/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

89K

14K

Completed sessions

1,131,790

160,645

Token share

0.25%

0.09%

Tokens

3.3T+100%

1.2T+100%

SEP 11NOV 5

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.